Relationships as a context for change

The relationship as a general building block for reasoning from first principles
The better we get at using first principles 
to understand relationships and change, 
the better we can then apply this 
understanding to handling change 
in general. Neil Keleher.


Relationships as a vehicle for change

Where ideas are the potential for change, like the component parts of a system viewed separately from the system (like a battery taken from a torch), relationships are where change actually occurs.

In a system that is actually working, a relationship provides the context for viewing change as it is transmitted from one idea to the other.

Laplace transforms and switching points of view

Laplace transforms are something we learned about while in engineering school. It's a method of switching points of view to make solving some types of problems easier. You change your point of view, solve the problem, and then switch back to the original point of view or perspective.

As an example, there are types of equations that can be used to describe circles. There are also equations that can be used to describe sinusoidal wave forms. With Laplace transforms,we can switch between these two types of equation.

Why might we want to do this?

Sometimes one type of equation is easier to solve than the other. So we switch views, solve the equation from this different perspective, and then switch back to the original perspective.

Now why would we switch between equations for a circle and equations for a sinusoid?

Because they are two different views of the same thing. If we take a spiral, then a circle is the view of that spiral when viewed from the end. Meanwhile the sinusoid is what you get when you view a spiral from the side.

Ideas and relationships are similiar.

Ideas and Relationships

Ideas and relationships give you complimentary views of the same thing.

We can look at a system as a set of component parts, the idea view. We can also look at a system as a set of interconnected relationships. This is the relationship or "signals" view.

Relationships are made up of two connected ideas.

Understanding a system in terms of ideas and relationships

When we understand all of the component ideas as well as how they relate, we understand the system as the sum of those ideas and relationships.

When we understand the relationships we understand how the system is supposed to work. However, when we understand the ideas that make it up, we also then have the possibility of being able to adapt the system when the need arises.

Driving and navigating

These two ways of viewing a system is very much akin to an artist painting or sculpting and then taking a step back to view the painting from afar. Taking a step back allows them to see what they are doing in the context of the whole so that they can make changes if they choose.

It could also be likened to driving, then taking a stop (pre-GPS) to take a look at a map to see whether we are on course or not.

In either case, the pausing, the stopping can allow for course corrections, if required.

One view isn't better than the other. What is more important is being able to switch points of view and that's the purpose of ideas and relationships. (and also limits for redefining ideas and relationships where required.)

While there are other ways to change how you view a system, I'll suggest here that these two views, and being able to switch between them, are the the two key points of view for generating understanding.

Before moving on, I should point out that while the artist is actually painting, they are creating change. They are in a relationship with the painting. They are physically connected via a brush. When they step back they break the physical connection. They then see the idea of the painting in relative isolation.

Likewise the driver. While driving, they are changing their relationship with the earth. This change stops when the car stops moving. And while the change has stopped, the driver can then check a map to see how their relationships has changed.

Using limits to define ideas and relationships

A basic tool for defining both ideas and relationships is the [limit].

Limits can be imaginary. They can also be real. As an example, country borders tend to be imaginary limits. They don't exist without humanity to make them real. Meanwhile, the borders of continents tend to be real.

Working with mechanical systems like guns or motorbikes, the boundaries between parts tend to be predefined or real. They are made that way. Likewise, electrical or electronic components also tend to have predefined parts and boundaries even if they are soldered together.

Working with the human body, the boundaries aren't so obvious. It's one of the main reasons that I teach muscle control because muscles create clearly definable and recognizable sensations when they are active. Likewise, so does connective tissue when it is stretched or otherwise under tension.

I practice (or at least used to) Chinese calligraphy and with block style calligraphy, brush strokes are easy to recognize. They have clearly defined limits. Meanwhile, working with cursive or grass style characters, the component parts are a little bit harder to define. (And so when learning this style, I look at turning points, changes in direction.)

The important thing about limits is first of all sensing them, or being able to sense them.

The second thing is that we can define them if and when we need to.

And the third thing is remembering or recognizing that limits can be imaginary constructs, we can get rid of them or change them whenever we need to.

This can be especially relevant when the thing we are studying is ourselves.

The nice thing about limits is that we can use them to divide big ideas into smaller ideas and relationships. We can then get rid of them when they are no longer required.

Now to what end?

The purpose of working from first principles

If we are talking about knowing the purpose of ideas, of systems of what we are trying to do, one big question we can ask is, what is the purpose of working from first principles?

To help us learn the thing we are applying first principles to and to help us understand it.

One way to view learning is that it is the process of building models within ourselves. These models are things that we can know or do or both. When the models are more than just surface detail or more than just rote memorization, but instead made up of ideas and relationships, we have understanding. This can mean we can pull up information from those models without having to think. It means we can act from those models, again without having to think.

Why understand something?

So that we can effectively create change and so that we can effectively deal with change.

Whether the thing we have applied first principles to is something outside of ourselves or is ourselves, the more we understand something, the more flexible we become. The more we can continue to act (effectively) despite whatever change is happening around ourselves (or, within ourselves.)

Note that relationships, by definition, are vehicles for change.

Change doesn't happen when an idea is isolated. When an idea is connected to another idea, that in itself is a change. And depending on the domain, that connection, that creation of a relationship then becomes the context for more change.

Making problem solving easier

In complex systems, when there is a problem, being able to break the system down into [ideas] and [relationships] using [limits] we can work towards figuring out the cause of the problem so that we can fix it.

And this is the beauty of being able to work from first principles. It makes figuring out problems easier. Ideas, relationships and limits are a general terminology to, ideally, make the idea of working from first principles easy to understand and easy to apply to any complex system, including ourselves.

Working from first principles is in and of itself an idea and learning to think or reason in terms of first principles is a way of changing ourselves. It gives us a set of tools that we can use to analyze the things (or people) that we work with.

It also gives us a set of tools that we can use to analyze ourselves.

What is the idea of what we are doing? What are the limits (the assumptions) that we are working with? Can they be changed? Should they be changed? What are the relationships? What is the Big idea that each of those relationships is a part of? Can we change the relationships, can we change the idea, can we change the type of change that we create?

Reasoning from first principles to become the change

Because first principles is in and of itself about understanding change, (and the potential for change) if we use it consistently enough we enable ourselves to better deal with actual change, by changing ourselves when we need to.

If something is outside our current realm of understanding, we can use first principles to break that something down so that we can learn it. We can break the something down into ideas and relationships.

Because relationships are the basic vehicle for change, the better we get at using first principles to understand relationships and change, the better we can then apply this understanding to handling change in general.

How do you increase your understanding?

At the very beginning of this chapter I said that one of the guiding tenets of working from first principles is knowing what you are trying to do. (Or, it's knowing what the system you are working with is supposed to do.)

If you don't know, working from first principles is a way of learning. Breaking system down into ideas and relationships helps you to learn. And if one particular way of breaking a system doesn't work you can break it down in other ways by changing the limits.

If you do know what you are trying to do, then that knowing can guide your initial use of limits. You can break down a system into ideas based on that initial knowing. Here again, the breakdown might not achieve a desired end. But that's allright. Because you've defined some component ideas, that can often make it easier to redefine ideas.

The simple process of breaking a system down into component ideas helps you to understand what you already understand. And it can show you where there are holes in your understanding.

But another way to view "understanding" is that the more ways you can break a system down into different [ideas] and [relationships], using different sets of [limits] the better your understanding.

The better we get at using first principles 
to understand relationships and change, 
the better we can then apply this 
understanding to handling change 
in general. Neil Keleher.
Published: 2021 01 24
Defining ideas, relationships (and change) for better understanding, problem solving and experiences

Articles by date

2021 11 12

The overlooked costs of poor indexing
Indexing methods; The benefits of good indexing; Why it takes time to save time

2021 10 18

An intro to better Mental Models, part 1
Mental models and their uses; 4 types of mental model; Simple building blocks for mental models

2021 09 16

Modularizing habits
Why we have habits and how we can change them and use them

2021 08 27

The Calculus of Thinking part 1
A scaleable framework for thinking creatively and for thinking for yourself

2021 08 25

Do you feel lucky?
Systemizing luck via patterns, models and good old "understanding"

2021 08 24

Learning to Understand
Becoming more self-reliant, while learning to think less (by pre-thinking)

2021 08 19

Overcoming frustration through habits
Frustration isn't always avoidable, but it can be minimized through habits

2021 08 18

A Good Death is its own Reward
Turning the thinking mind off

2021 05 03

Creating Space
To get in the flow a basic principle is to look for the space to flow through rather than at the things that prevent flow

2021 03 14

Working from first principles
Two points of view for understanding any system

2021 01 24

Relationships as a context for change
The [relationship] as a general building block for reasoning from first principles

2021 01 22

Muscle Control
A first principles approach to learning to feel and control your body

2021 01 20

Ideas as First Principle building blocks
The qualities of ideas that make them useful for working from first principles

2021 01 19

First principles
The art of modelling for function rather than form

2021 01 07

Building intuition
Why working from first principles is more than just understanding component parts (but also component relationships)

2020 12 03

Ideas as Units of Meaning
And as the Potential for Change

2020 10 05

Creating an easy-lookup indexing system for Chinese Characters
The importance of indexing in general

2020 09 19

Learning to understand complex systems in terms of ideas, relationships and change
Plus side trips down memory lane and how the method of loci relates to understanding

2020 09 18

Information, energy and the idea of change
Why it makes sense that information could have mass

2020 09 15

Indexing, context and understanding
How effective indexing makes it easier to find things and can lead to better understanding via the method of loci

2020 09 01

Right and wrong versus better possibilities
sometimes you just have to make a decission

2020 09 01

How to make decision making easier
Understanding short term memory (so that you can work effectively within its limits)

2020 09 01

A calculus for learning your body
The basics of "learning to understand"

2020 07 31

Learning Chinese by reading It
How to say "peed all over the toilet seat" in Chinese

2019 07 22

About Neil Keleher
Simplifying chaos

2019 07 21

Rewriting Our Operating Systems
Becoming Better at Being ourselves

2019 07 21

Being Present, What it Means
and How to Get There

2019 07 19

Being Present, a Non-Critical (but critical) State of Mind
(That's often more fun!)

2019 07 12

Basic Principles: Ideas as Units of Meaning
And as the Potential for Change

2019 04 24

What is zero parallax?
How to account for viewing error to measure change, create change and to understand

2019 04 24

Zero Parallax
Tools for learning to understand

2019 04 24

Flexible thinking(Formerly "Learning to Understand")
A First Principles approach to understanding systems from two points of view by using components and stories